From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] ASCII back-end for new export engine Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:59:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87y5stqm9g.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pqec4xua.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtvk6j0.fsf@gmail.com> <87obtrel2z.fsf@gmail.com> <8739b2sctn.fsf@gmail.com> <817h0d4lc6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqmNB-0006MT-2U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:01:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqmN5-0000Xy-4R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:01:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:41943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqmN4-0000Xn-RR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:01:43 -0500 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so1686194wib.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:01:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <817h0d4lc6.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:40:33 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: Org Mode List Hello, Jambunathan K writes: >> I have no objection to implement limited numbering in both LaTeX and >> ASCII back-ends, but I'd like to know if it can be handled consistently >> in every other major back-end, too. I'm CC-ing Jambunathan to know his >> opinion about it. > > I can support this in ODT exporter. We can make this a feature of the > new export engine. I've now implemented this for e-latex and e-ascii back-ends. >>> A way to set individual headings as numbered or unnumbered would be >>> deluxe. Perhaps this is possible, but I haven't found it? >> >> It would require to modify Org's syntax (how to tell which headline has >> to be numbered and which has not?). It is not possible at the moment. > > Let us not support this. I tend to agree here. This can be obviously discussed on the list, detail specifications and so on, but I'd rather postpone any real coding in this area until new exporter is installed in core. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou