From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: capture template question
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:07:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87y5lxpc2x.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87mx2deqc0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
	<878vdx3hb1.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87pq79d71n.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52567)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Swwyr-0004Zu-9v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:06:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Swwyq-0007w9-70
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:06:29 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:62995)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Swwyp-0007vy-W1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:06:28 -0400
Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so3889303wib.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87pq79d71n.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of
	"Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:36:36 +0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Rather than trying to add various ways of citing links, perhaps it would
> be nice to have a format code for the literal link to the thing under
> point at time of capture? What I mean is, something like "%l" so I could
> do this:
>
> * EMAIL Respond to [[%l][%:fromname]]%?

Good idea.  You can now use %l to insert this literal link.

-- 
 Bastien