From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: calfw-org broken?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:53:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87y5kw8jhd.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
References: <87ehmoevl8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<BLU0-SMTP2125CE3BA8486085B29056BBA70@phx.gbl>
	<87r4qo7rlm.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<BLU0-SMTP6052690F42740055F9658EBBA70@phx.gbl>
	<87d328u76j.fsf@altern.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43099)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>) id 1T773R-00017g-4F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:53:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>) id 1T773Q-0004a8-4F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:53:13 -0400
Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([147.32.192.36]:48890)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>) id 1T773P-0004a0-Tb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:53:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d328u76j.fsf@altern.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>, Charles Philip Chan <cpchan@bell.net>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Thu, Aug 30 2012, Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Charles Philip Chan <cpchan@bell.net> writes:
>
>> I do have an Agenda buffer opened when I tested it out. I can reproduce
>> what you got with no Agenda buffer present.
>
> This is because the function calls `org-compile-prefix-format', which
> needs an agenda buffer.  I removed this need, so things will be better
> in the next minor release.

Great, now it works perfectly for me.

Thanks,
-Michal