From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Standardize #+BIBLIOGRAPHY line Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:58:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87y58y4ryh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3kjyr37.fsf@gmail.com> <87hafn55l0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip02wx96.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbm67rq.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbmwvsy.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Gck-0003Rw-9M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Gcj-0006uZ-6G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:58:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]:48633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Gcj-0006uO-0a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:58:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a12so6122534wgh.16 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874nbmwvsy.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:17:41 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jambunathan K writes: >> I understand. You can still use ox-bibtex.el for now, and just ignore >> all the "[[cite:...]]" part. > > Each citation processor should reside in it's own file. So ox-jabref.el > is the right place for my changes. LaTeX and HTML processors already reside in ox-bibtex.el. If you want to create a new file, so be it, but try at least to require ox-bibtex and use existing accessors and predicates to maintain compatibility. > It seems that you are not interested in introducing ox-cite.el or a > make-shift `citation-reference' element. I don't know what led you to this conclusion. I'm very much interested in supporting bibliographies from Org. I also know it will require to implement a new citation object in the process. I'm just pointing out two things: - ox-bibtex will have to be implemented differently (e.g., no more defadvices). So, it's not just about moving ox-bibtex into another directory. - before discussing (again) citations syntax, we must ensure that this is a realistic goal. IOW we need a proof of concept for, at least, every major back-end (including ASCII). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou