From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: front-matter support in version 8.0? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:25:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87y58w5si7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130723073141.GA16607@panahar> <87txjl4r4q.fsf@gmail.com> <20130724042336.GB12466@panahar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1tRv-0001ZB-KS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:25:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1tRt-0004eX-QA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:25:27 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]:50983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1tRt-0004eS-G2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:25:25 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t61so2976998wes.17 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from selenimh ([91.224.148.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ev19sm3225262wid.2.2013.07.24.00.25.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:25:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130724042336.GB12466@panahar> (Vikas Rawal's message of "Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:53:36 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Hello, Vikas Rawal writes: >> > How is one expected to add front-matter for latex export in ver 8.0? >> >> You disable default table of contents and use TOC keyword (see manual) >> to put it wherever you want. E.g., >> >> #+OPTIONS: toc:nil >> >> #+BEGIN_ABSTRACT >> [Abstract here] >> #+END_ABSTRACT >> >> #+TOC: headlines > > > Thanks. This works fine. Is there a neat way to add other kind of > frontmatter (Preface, Acknowledgements etc) too? Is it different from the current example? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou