From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Syntax for macros
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:25:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87y51zta1a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <86ha8n6ulq.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57115)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W8ROn-0006jh-7e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:25:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W8ROf-0001Xr-4C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:25:33 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45297)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W8ROe-0001X1-Sh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:25:25 -0500
Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1W8ROc-00068j-2P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:25:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <86ha8n6ulq.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of
	"Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:49:21 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <public-sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@plane.gmane.org>
Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org



"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
writes:

> This would be much more easy to read, IMO:
>
>   This {hlt(information)} is important.

But more prone to false positives.

> Would this be possible?  If so, would you want that as well?

Reducing to {{...}} could be better, but I'm not sure this is
what will make your friends happy :)

-- 
 Bastien