From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: query about past scheduled events display in agenda Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:38:50 -0700 Message-ID: <87y3w4dhqt.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87y3w5hgai.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ziglfmuh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8bd8d4fb8cea4cff82b125f05ba756dd@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <87k27pdolt.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871stxf0hg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cod6z-0006kH-CG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:39:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cod6w-0003nL-8k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:39:09 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=56758 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cod6w-0003n3-22 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:39:06 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cod6n-0008FN-GR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:38:57 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric S Fraga writes: > >> On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 13:45, Detlef Steuer wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I have a +2 for "something" scheduled for yesterday. >>> Org git from the morning. >> >> Thanks for confirming. Mine was with yesterday's version of org. >> >> Nicolas, I think you may have been thinking of a different issue >> entirely. > > Indeed. > > However, isn't the current behaviour the right one? I meant, in the > given example, it was scheduled once "yesterday", so it is really the > second time it is scheduled today, hence the "2x". > > Another way to look at it is by some sloppy analogy to algebra: you > write "2 \times{} x" but scarcely "1 \times{} x". I think people are thinking of it as "number of days I've failed to complete my scheduled item".