From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:52:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3kp4qnn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87bmhooaj9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tvveqi7u.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wp0a57i5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lggp6fvh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1216ca1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edi9E-0002Q3-1Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:52:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edi9B-00080c-EY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:52:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:31:51 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Bastien Guerry , Achim Gratz , Org Mode List Kaushal Modi writes: > Thank you. I'd like to see Org snippets in src blocks as they are not any > "raw" monospace text blocks. But if no one else has a strong opinion for > using src blocks for Org snippets, then I guess I'll have to concede. There is another issue with "begin_src org" blocks. If your example contains a link, you only see the description part, not the whole syntax. Thus #+begin_src org [[path][description]] #+end_src is seen as #+begin_src org description #+end_src which can be very confusing. There is no such issue with example blocks and fixed-width areas.