From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io>
Subject: Re: Tasks performed on a certain day
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:33:59 +0900
Message-ID: <87y3a5dsuw.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org>
References: <87sh0efgs3.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> <xuu6pnviqf7g.fsf@gmail.com>
	<878t25g09o.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org>
	<CAFdBzEpNg1o0XeKG_6FsmhspE4gcrvvudc0qx6n5Mi9=d-1VrA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49131)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@gaspard.io>) id 1gKM67-000848-LH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:34:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@gaspard.io>) id 1gKM63-0003ov-Nz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:34:11 -0500
Received: from grym.ekleog.org ([94.23.42.210]:57702 helo=smtp.gaspard.ninja)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo@gaspard.io>) id 1gKM63-0003oF-Cx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:34:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFdBzEpNg1o0XeKG_6FsmhspE4gcrvvudc0qx6n5Mi9=d-1VrA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric S Fraga <esflists@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com> writes:

> What about passive date stamps?
>
> TODO Thing
> <Date>
>
> ?

That's exactly what I was looking for! I hadn't seen an example with
TODO coupled with <> dates, and didn't think it'd have a special
behavior.

Thank you and Marcin for this solution!

Cheers,
  Leo