From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Bug or not a bug? dot expansion in ob-shell
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:13:37 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2st4fb2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CA+A2iZaziAfMeGpBqL6qGrzrWEVvLvC0DUw++T4gCF3NGuW-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eeur3p1p.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87a75eap8k.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y2sy3kkl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r1yq4xiz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <875zg2kcy0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87h7zmiw0v.fsf@gmail.com>
 <871rqqag19.fsf@bzg.fr> <87wo8iitzz.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
 <87ftf63d79.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnear7tl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
 <87v9o236v1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAGY83EddDG1oi=pA+EDm41WNbhK0wb=oMGk1TDO2rY4z7LKSqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8736b66z6t.fsf@gnu.org>
 <877e0h571l.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <878skwbc3g.fsf@bzg.fr>
 <8736b36492.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com>
 <87imjyoi99.fsf@gnu.org> <m1mu99ws2u.fsf@nobis-it.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40552)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1j5r4m-0001Xw-Ug
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:13:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m1mu99ws2u.fsf@nobis-it.eu> (Stefan Nobis's message of "Sun, 23
 Feb 2020 10:50:17 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Nobis <stefan-ml@snobis.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Stefan,

Stefan Nobis <stefan-ml@snobis.de> writes:

> The downside would be that many existing Org documents needs to be
> fixed (but maybe it would be not too hard to automate the adjustments)
> and some source blocks may become a little more verbose.

Yes, backward-compatibilities issues, verbosity, and a non-functional
default are problematic.

I think we will have a better view on what is a sensible default after
we try to document the current behavior for the main languages.

Also, such a documentation page will be useful even after we change
the defaults, if we do this.

-- 
 Bastien