From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug or not a bug? dot expansion in ob-shell
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:39:55 -0800
Message-ID: <87y2sltnas.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+A2iZaziAfMeGpBqL6qGrzrWEVvLvC0DUw++T4gCF3NGuW-DQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eeur3p1p.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87a75eap8k.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y2sy3kkl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r1yq4xiz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <875zg2kcy0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87h7zmiw0v.fsf@gmail.com> <871rqqag19.fsf@bzg.fr>
 <87wo8iitzz.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ftf63d79.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87pnear7tl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87v9o236v1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAGY83EddDG1oi=pA+EDm41WNbhK0wb=oMGk1TDO2rY4z7LKSqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8736b66z6t.fsf@gnu.org> <877e0h571l.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com>
 <878skwbc3g.fsf@bzg.fr> <8736b36492.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com>
 <87imjyoi99.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2slqudr.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49643)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <jackkamm@gmail.com>) id 1j84Es-0007Nl-2e
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:41:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <jackkamm@gmail.com>) id 1j84Eq-0005v5-V7
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:41:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87y2slqudr.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Sorry, I was confused about this:

> According to my reading of this thread, most of the commenters were in
> agreement that we should keep the original behavior and return the exit
> code, as we do in 9.3.

Actually, it looks like ":results value" does return the exit code. I
just got confused because shell blocks now return the output when no
":results" is specified.