From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:53:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87wstnkkt0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <87ejfvm0s3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<20071016163144.GE3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ihpfy-0001Oj-18
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:53:50 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ihpfv-0001OX-Rz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:53:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ihpfv-0001OU-Ot
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:53:47 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Ihpfv-0007va-EU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:53:47 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1780855nfh
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20071016163144.GE3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's
	message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:31:44 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org> writes:

> I'm curious about your suggestion of '<<' though - does that imply the
> sub-keymap functionality I asked for already exists?

I first thought yes, since it looks like the first `<' keystroke is
waiting for the next one (at least from the description I proposed).

But in fact there is no sub-keymap involved here: it's only about
cycling through three states: 

- not-restricted
- buffer-restricted
- subtree/region-resctricted

Then three keystrokes would turn off the restriction.

But calling a sub-keymap with `<' could also be useful:

`< <' : cycle through default restricted states (see above)
`< f' : prompt for an org-agenda-file to restrict to
`< s' : prompt for a subtree to restrict

Caveat: we should better not allow interactive restriction to a
property, since this is the job of the custom-command itself...

My 2.5 cents.

-- 
Bastien