From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Cycling visibility of blocks Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:52:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87ws7ua891.fsf@selenimh.orion.org> References: <87skiuryr2.fsf@selenimh.orion.org> <87ljomnfni.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <04195B46-5D81-4E64-8315-CD2085E49357@gmail.com> <87y6slmteu.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <87ljokncfd.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <8D2C1863-8174-47C2-A195-3887FB10374F@gmail.com> <878wkabnkc.fsf@selenimh.orion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBXE9-0000f6-0l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MBXE8-0000dM-4n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45409 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MBXE7-0000cw-TC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:39 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:50748) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBXE7-00065W-IU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:39 -0400 Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr ([93.17.128.20]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MBXE6-0006fl-Kl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:52:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878wkabnkc.fsf@selenimh.orion.org> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:36:03 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Hum, 1. My apologies for the From: header in my previous post, I just realized I had messed up badly with my gnus-posting-style variable; 2. While I'm at it: two line --> two lines. -- Nicolas Goaziou