From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: What license for Worg?
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:50:09 -0400
Message-ID: <87wrs8g87y.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca>
References: <874ofd19fd.fsf@altern.org> <87fwyxq7bu.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43618 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Og05o-00057A-Ct
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:50:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1Og05n-00020g-5v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:50:32 -0400
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:53769)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1Og05n-0001z8-3f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:50:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87fwyxq7bu.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Mon, 02
	Aug 2010 18:59:17 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>

David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de> writes:

> Bastien wrote:
>>Hi all,
>
>>what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg?
>
>>Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the
>>GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA
>>3.0[3] license.  This solution would make it possible to take excerpts
>>from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs,
>>which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual.
>
>>Would any Worg contributor have objection to this?
>
> No objection.  Would have suggested the same.

No objection here either.

-Bernt