From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Maus Subject: Re: Re: [ANN] Changes to lists Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:19:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87wrlme543.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> References: <87k4hve0y7.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87sjwe18cm.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <877hdqkro8.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1531836061==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45447 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pja1d-0000QM-RI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:21:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pja1c-0005Ho-Li for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:21:17 -0500 Received: from mailout110.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.110]:45753 helo=mysql1.xlhost.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pja1c-0005Hi-Gq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:21:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877hdqkro8.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============1531836061== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jan_30_17:19:40_2011-1"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jan_30_17:19:40_2011-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII At Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:39:03 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > > The unfinished checkboxes and progress cookies are not boldened as > > they are in Orgmode itself and putting a hidden "X" inside the not > > begun checkboxes is somewhat tenous as the "hidden" attribute might > > not be honored (as happens for example if you display with "no > > style"). Putting a non-breaking space there might be a better idea. > > As far as I can remember, I did not change this behavior. Though, I > don't mind boldening empty and unfinished checkboxes as well, nor I do > mind exchanging the hidden attribute for a non-breaking space. > > What do others users think about this ? The non-breaking space in an unchecked item would not (necessarily) be as wide as the X in a checked item. But a checkbox list that does not align is in my eyes far better than unchecked items that appear as checked when viewed w/o CSS. Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de --pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jan_30_17:19:40_2011-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk1Fj5wACgkQma24O1pEeOaVJwD9FHqADJoC7JPfZjhk1jrZD1Mx 9/RFiSk6YWheOUc9fPIA/01Q0KuTOkD3t+z4c2dDRCUoFuduo+MOk4EKQux/b//3 =D/UG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Jan_30_17:19:40_2011-1-- --===============1531836061== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1531836061==--