From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Subject: Re: Occurance property, or some similar name?
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:41:49 -0500
Message-ID: <87wrizpm4y.fsf@dustycloud.org>
References: <87d3ksqujv.fsf@dustycloud.org> <4DA3D37B.7070500@theocrite.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51755)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1Q9emg-0007gU-Q2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:41:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1Q9emf-0005ec-8O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:41:38 -0400
Received: from li28-75.members.linode.com ([75.127.72.75]:44661)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cwebber@dustycloud.org>) id 1Q9emf-0005eJ-57
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:41:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4DA3D37B.7070500@theocrite.org> (theo's message of "Tue, 12 Apr
	2011 06:22:19 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: theo <theocrite@theocrite.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

theo <theocrite@theocrite.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On 12/04/2011 00:42, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> I was once one of the many people who apparently originally
>> misunderstood what "SCHEDULED" meant, and used to set it to like, an
>> appointment time.
>
> That's what I do.
>
> Maybe I lack background, but why do you think it's not appropriate for
> this use?

So when it comes to TODO like things, SCHEDULED is when you should start
working on it, DEADLINE is when it's due.

One side effect of doing it "wrong" is that non-TODO items that are
SCHEDULED stay on your agenda forever (or until archived, and still
forever with archive view on), which is nasty.

--=20
=F0=9D=93=92=F0=9D=93=B1=F0=9D=93=BB=F0=9D=93=B2=F0=9D=93=BC=F0=9D=93=BD=F0=
=9D=93=B8=F0=9D=93=B9=F0=9D=93=B1=F0=9D=93=AE=F0=9D=93=BB =F0=9D=93=90=F0=
=9D=93=B5=F0=9D=93=B5=F0=9D=93=AA=F0=9D=93=B7 =F0=9D=93=A6=F0=9D=93=AE=F0=
=9D=93=AB=F0=9D=93=AB=F0=9D=93=AE=F0=9D=93=BB