From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: [babel] using #+call for inline results Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:12:27 -0700 Message-ID: <87wrg45zpg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mxhaunsi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mxh9omwb.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxh9pvz8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87sjr1i040.fsf@gmail.com> <4E030676.3070504@christianmoe.com> <87hb7ej1pu.fsf@gmail.com> <4E071E71.4060804@christianmoe.com> <87vcvsruzs.fsf@gmail.com> <4E082041.6080709@christianmoe.com> <87y60n5fvx.fsf@counsyl.com> <80vcvqidqm.fsf@somewhere.org> <874o39d7ew.fsf@gmail.com> <80hb79dr0i.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbyJY-0006xl-Jx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:12:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbyJW-0004zk-KS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:12:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:62040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbyJV-0004yH-W8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:12:34 -0400 Received: by pwi12 with SMTP id 12so1253643pwi.0 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:12:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80hb79dr0i.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:40:45 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Schulte wrote: >>> Well, I have many other problems with this version (such as speed commands >>> not working anymore, yasnippet expansion not working anymore on TAB, some >>> files which say they're not in Org-agenda-files, etc.) but that's another >>> story. >> >> I don't understand, are you saying that all of the above problems are caused >> by the introduction of inline call lines? I have not experienced any of >> these problems. > > No, I just said I had many other little problems since the last git update. > Though, I did not know where they come from. Now, I am positive that it comes > from the LOB. See the ECM I sent yesterday, and the similar report done > yesterday by Darlan. > Hi Seb, I don't know what you are referencing above, but if the new LOB behavior is causing problems then I certainly want to help resolve them. Can you link me to the "ECM" you mentioned, and to Darlan's report? > >>> About this, my only weirdness is that I had to confirm 12 times (yes, 12!) >>> that I wanted to execute the calls. >>> >>> I have this in my emacs config file for months >>> >>> ;; don't be prompted on every code block evaluation >>> (setq org-confirm-babel-evaluate nil) >>> >>> ... has this var become a local file variable? >> >> This has not become a buffer local variable and I can not reproduce your >> problem, could you please submit a minimal configuration with which I >> can reproduce this problem. > > When removing the Org file with the SQL code from my org-agenda-files, and > relaunching Emacs (on an updated git), I don't see that problem anymore... > Maybe related to the above problem, then. > Hmm, could you send me a copy (or minimal subset) of this offending Org-mode file that causes the multiple prompts? Are you loading this file using `org-babel-lob-ingest'? > >>> Last thing: the questions in the echo area sometimes display the block name >>> in parentheses, sometimes not... >>> >>> - "Evaluate this emacs-lisp code block (square) on your system? (yes or no)" >>> - "Evaluate this emacs-lisp code block on your system? (yes or no)" >> >> When the code block has a name, the name is shown in parens, when the code >> block is not named no name is shown. > > What I did not understand, is that these messages appeared when running the > example file I took, where only one block is defined, and that block is named. > Hence, I'd expect to always see the same message, with the block name in > parentheses. > > Though, as I don't have to confirm anymore (the symptom disappeared), we can > put this in the fridge... but for the problem with the LOB file (see > thtp://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg43083.html). > Oh, I see, the file in question is mentioned in this linked email. I will take a look and see if I can reproduce locally. Expect more from me on this today. Cheers -- Eric > > Best regards, > Seb -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/