From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Using org-mode for Research and Notetaking Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:40:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87wrfie8d9.fsf@altern.org> References: <81d3hi75oj.fsf@gmail.com> <818vs674t7.fsf@gmail.com> <87liw582jg.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkkktwwk.fsf_-_@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <87bowy4l0j.fsf@gnu.org> <80wrfm33hm.fsf@somewhere.org> <874o2q2zr8.fsf@gnu.org> <87bowyi9e8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qi3ep-0002X1-10 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:07:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qi3el-0005Za-UB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:07:42 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]:60183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qi3ek-0005W6-NX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:07:39 -0400 Received: by mail-fx0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 18so3424445fxd.39 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bowyi9e8.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:43:11 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Sebastien Vauban , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi all, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> 1. people want inline tasks with possibly no TODO keyword >> 2. people prefer to detect them *very easily* >> 3. changing the syntax of inline tasks from changing todos >> (like !TODO) is too complicated code-wise > > 4. people do not want to break the main flow of text. By default, the > text in the inline task starts at the 15th column. Of course, you're right. >> My proposal is this: >> >> - enforce the use of TODO keywords in inline tasks (wrt 1) > > I think it is an unnecessary restriction. I remember some people use > inline tasks without even a title (they only write the stars). Yes. > IMO, inline tasks are used in two distinct fashions. Obviously, one is > to use them as tasks. The other one is to use them as marginal notes, > like drawers with a title. Let's not forget that second category, unless > we provide an alternative solution for them, i.e. an annotation system. > >> - make a special face for inline tasks (wrt 2) > > I think it is a good idea. Okay, TODO added. Thanks, -- Bastien