From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: New feature: loop over siblings for some commands
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:54:40 +0200
Message-ID: <87wrf24wfj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87aacchtv8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkkayvld.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<87pql4g2fg.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87pqkvu4ij.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87wrf3lfwk.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36276)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QmMMF-0005pe-Fu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:54:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QmMME-00026U-Gu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:54:19 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:41284)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1QmMME-00026O-4x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:54:18 -0400
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1919372wyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87wrf3lfwk.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Wed, 27
	Jul 2011 20:47:23 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi David,

David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de> writes:

> My vacation starts saturday so I do have time and really like to get
> my hands dirty with some Lisp hacking.

Great, thanks.

> Now for the macro (2 iterations later): It might not be necessary to
> factor out the functions if the function that invokes the looping
> can be called recursively.

I've applied the first two patches that I sent in my previous email,
thus removing the previous half-baked functionality.  

If you can have a look at the third patch and start from there, that
would be great -- this third patch has some problems (with C-u C-c C-s
for example) and was just a first attempt.

Thanks for any update on this!

Best,

-- 
 Bastien