From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Updating Worg re standard source block syntax Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:55:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87wr9y0wjr.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35263) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbBlA-0007AM-Nk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:54:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbBl6-0001by-0y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:54:08 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:61942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbBl5-0001bn-O3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:54:03 -0500 Received: by werf1 with SMTP id f1so125924wer.0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:54:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Martyn Jago's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:43:18 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Martyn Jago Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Martyn, Martyn Jago writes: > There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within > Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg > reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding > edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org community spirit of > Worg), but I fail to find any specific notice regarding this. I saw you updated Worg wrt this. Thanks a lot for this! -- Bastien