From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Scientific papers related to Org-mode Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:05:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87wr5mvglo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2012-04-09T20-39-13@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87aa2khgr2.fsf@gnu.org> <87obr0g6dt.fsf@gmx.com> <4F83E773.8060801@gmail.com> <4F83F913.3000304@gmail.com> <87d37g0x1c.fsf@altern.org> <4F83FC19.4000601@gmail.com> <87ehrvfhqu.fsf@gnu.org> <4F853498.8040104@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsXI-000302-2D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:04:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsXG-0005K7-B2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:04:15 -0400 Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:6482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHsXG-0005Hy-4d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:04:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F853498.8040104@gmail.com> (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:36:56 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: R.M.Krug@gmail.com Cc: news1142@karl-voit.at, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rainer M Krug writes: > I would actually suggest: > * How can I cite org when I am using it for a publication? > > Yes. Please cite the manual. Evaluate this function and run =M-x > org-insert-manual-bitex-citation-at-point RET=. Please submit a patch for this. (Clone Worg, edit it, then `C-x v =' to see the diff.) >> I don't think we need this in Org's core, but it's good to have it somewhere. > > I would actually put it into Org's core and also add it to the org - documentation menu, so that > it is easy to find and can easily be updated. In addition, a function in the FAQ needs to be added > manually, and I think a way to cite the manual should be in the > product itself. Adding it to org.texi would be okay, please submit a patch. Thanks, -- Bastien