From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: words starting with call_ confuse C-c C-c and export
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:46:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87wqjhu5i1.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ob4ytoqf.wl%n142857@gmail.com> <87zjohvem7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87iov16b3d.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56579)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Vp1MC-0003wb-2u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:46:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Vp1M3-0007EV-LQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:46:36 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]:41574)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Vp1M3-0007EJ-EK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:46:27 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bz8so1261496wib.4
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:46:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87iov16b3d.fsf@gmail.com> (Eric Schulte's message of "Fri, 06
	Dec 2013 12:09:40 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:

>> We may tweak `org-babel-inline-lob-one-liner-regexp' in order to make it
>> harder to trigger it unwillingly. 
>>
>
> The trade-off here is between raising an error when e.g., a like
> matching the call line syntax has a problem or failing silently.  The
> former is preferable in the case where you intend the syntax to be a
> call and you *do* want to know if there is a problem, and the latter is
> preferable if you aren't trying to issue a call and just stumbled upon
> the syntax.
>
> I'm open to either solution, it's just a question of which use case is
> more important and which failure condition is more onerous.

Just to be clear, I thought about making parens mandatory in inline
Babel call syntax. Underscore is overloaded already: underline,
subscript...

Note that OP's problem can be solved once we have escaped underscores
(again). But I'm not there yet.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou