From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: html checkbox output
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:10:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87wqidcqms.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20131206215321.GA48654@eyeBook> <87siu5txkx.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87r48ot7g2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39447)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W084d-00020Q-9p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:10:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1W084X-0007H1-Qs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 06:10:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r48ot7g2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 04 Jan
	2014 10:36:13 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Nicolas and Rick,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> A new buffer keyword (which needs to be documented in org.texi),
>> a defcustom with a completely free sexp... Isn't it a bit too much for
>> mere checkboxes?
>
> Personally I think the defcustom is enough, as this choice is likely
> to be made for all Org documents.
>
>> Filters provide almost the same functionality:
>>
>>   (defun my-checkbox-filter (item backend info)
>>     (when (org-export-derived-backend-p backend 'html)
>>       (replace-regexp-in-string "\\`.*\\(<code>\\[\\(X\\|&#xa0;\\|-\\)\\]</code>\\).*$"
>>                                 (lambda (rep)
>>                                   (let ((check (match-string 2 rep)))
>>                                     (cond ((equal check "X") "&#x2611;")
>>                                           ((equal check "-") "&#x2610;")
>>                                           (t "&#x2610;"))))
>>                                 item
>>                                 nil nil 1)))
>>   (add-to-list 'org-export-filter-item-functions 'my-checkbox-filter)
>
> Yes, but a defcustom would be easier.

As long as it doesn't let you write completely free sexps. Otherwise,
a function is equally complex.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou