From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Org release 8.2.5g (minor release from maint) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:00:43 -0700 Message-ID: <87wqg7ug6a.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3dtsat8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqhtywkx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fvocbigv.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ios0vdnr.fsf@gmail.com> <8761ny2sj6.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ob1qf5br.fsf@gmail.com> <87siqxrfkr.fsf@gmail.com> <87eh2ho1bk.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d2i1e3fu.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLgcA-0000eQ-K5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:18:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLgc6-0005YO-1g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:18:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]:44721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLgc5-0005YI-R8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:18:01 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v10so3158379pde.11 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:18:01 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nick Dokos Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >>>> I have the impression that cl-lib is (was?) frowned upon by upstream for >>>> packages that are included in the emacs distribution. But it's only >>>> a vague recollection at this point: am I wrong? am I thinking of >>>> something else common-lispish? >>> >>> I thought that the point of cl-lib was so that packages like Org-mode >>> and gnus would stop re-implementing pieces of the cl package. I could >>> easily be wrong. >> >> I remembered seeing something on emacs-devel about this, and just found >> this statement from Stefan Monnier from a few days ago: >> >> >> Note that the main motivation behind the move to cl-lib is so that it's >> perfectly acceptable to use cl-lib functions (since they don't pollute >> the global namespace any more). So if you prefer to avoid cl-lib >> functions, that's fine, but if you want to use them, that's perfectly >> fine as well. >> >> >> Stefan >> >> Interpret as you will! >> >> > > Thanks for putting me right! Great, so should Org-mode require cl-lib and stop supporting the following functions? - org-block - org-count - org-every - org-find-if - org-reduce - org-remove-if - org-remove-if-not - org-return - org-some - org-sort - org-sublist -- Eric Schulte https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte PGP: 0x614CA05D