From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] ob-core.el: allow the auto-generation of output
 file names for src blocks.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:07:58 -0400
Message-ID: <87wqeg8fhs.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1398196476-4773-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com>
	<87bnvt2h6r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2g92au5.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87vbu0d0hs.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50856)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Wcv8W-0000yl-MI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:14:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Wcv8R-0006pz-7m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:14:44 -0400
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi Aaron,
>
> Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> How does this sound as an algorithm:
>> 1. if :file is present, behave exactly as we do now
>> 2. if :file is absent but :file-ext and a #+name is present, generate a
>>    :file parameter from :output-dir, the #+name, and :file-ext.
>
> I suggest this one:
>
> 1. if :file is present, behave exactly as we do now
>
> 2. if :file-ext is present:
>
>    - if #+name is present, generate a :file parameter
>      from :output-dir, #+name and :file-ext
>
>    - otherwise, generate the :file parameter from
>      :output-dir, the headline or the title or the
>      current file name and :file-ext
>
> Just falling back on something sensible when :file is absent
> and :file-ext is specified.
>    

FWIW I'm in full agreement here, see my other email for one sensible
alternative.  (Sorry to split up my reply, the hazards of an
asynch/batch email pull/read/write/push setup.)

>
>> Open questions:
>> 1. should :file-ext without a #+name be a no-op, or an error?
>
> See above.
>
>> 2. should :output-dir apply to the :file case as well?
>
> To me yes.
>
> In overall I think would be good, but I'd like Eric and other
> babelist around here to have a look before we commit this.
> So perhaps another round of patch testing will be good.
>

I agree here.

Thanks again,

>
> Thanks!

-- 
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D