From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [FeatReq] New option for `org-entry-properties' WHICH argument? Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:23:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87wqaxz98v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ha37jrip.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofq-0007YH-Kr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofb-0005ry-3H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:22 -0400 Received: from mail-s76.mailgun.info ([184.173.153.204]:52313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBofb-0005j9-0a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:25:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ha37jrip.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:21:50 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > what about adding one more option for WHICH > > ,----[ C-h f org-entry-properties RET ] > | org-entry-properties is a compiled Lisp function in `org.el'. > | > | (org-entry-properties &optional POM WHICH SPECIFIC) > | [...] > | If WHICH is nil or `all', get all properties. If WHICH is > | `special' or `standard', only get that subclass. If WHICH > | is a string only get exactly this property. SPECIFIC can be a string, the > | specific property we are interested in. Specifying it can speed > | things up because then unnecessary parsing is avoided. > `---- > > that would filter out all Org related properties, i.e. the properties > the system itself uses, and thus return only the application related > properties? > > E.g. option 'non-org' You mean `non-special' or `non-standard'? I.e. all properties that are not listed as special properties? Yes, I see how it would be useful. Can you provide a patch for this? Thanks, -- Bastien