From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:46:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87wq0x9zod.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan>
References: <20150427165913.76b92acc@gaia> <874mo1bmhb.fsf@selenimh.mobile.lan>
	<20150427195542.6f7ecdff@linux-w3xx.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46442)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Ymo2F-0001nN-KJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:45:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Ymo2D-0002V1-M9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:45:39 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:59647)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Ymo2D-0002UE-BJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:45:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150427195542.6f7ecdff@linux-w3xx.localdomain> (Detlef Steuer's
	message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:55:42 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Detlef Steuer <detlef.steuer@gmx.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Detlef Steuer <detlef.steuer@gmx.de> writes:

> The real file2.org is somewhat big and would be scanned completely,
> wouldn't it?

Only special keywords are parsed.

The advantage of SETUPFILE is that it works even outside of export.

>> Set-up (e.g., link abbreviations) is not refreshed after expanding
>> INCLUDE keywords. I cannot remember why, tho. Maybe for (dubious)
>> efficiency reasons.
>
> If you don't remember, may be it would be possible to try it out?
> Would love it and as a feature it looks natural for an included file!

I agree. I added this in 2965f8fb0c048a20b52ba90627e7cca6fe706c93. Thank
you.


Regards,