From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: funny emacs-lisp macro behavior in org-babel related to
 lexical-binding
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 22:49:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87wpnysikp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m2y48gavgi.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56456)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1arAef-0000e1-Ty
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:47:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1arAeb-0006vF-UE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:47:53 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:38350)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1arAeY-0006tL-QV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:47:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2y48gavgi.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local> (John Kitchin's message
	of "Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:36:45 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> So, I would like to propose adding the third argument to the eval
> statement that reads 
>
> (assoc :lexical params)
>
> to turn on lexical eval if you want it.
>
> What do you think?

I assume you're talking about ob-emacs-lisp.el. This sounds like a good
idea. However, I suggest to make lexical binding the default value, to
be on par with the rest of Emacs.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou