From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: Feature request: lists with letters Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:38 -0800 Message-ID: <87wpd8xrh9.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87shnwbiyx.fsf@posteo.de> <87tw8ccwae.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r33gbcrg.fsf@posteo.de> <87bmukcqnn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87poj0bbpo.fsf@posteo.de> <87zii4bb0y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZO4n-0000ez-Ud for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 15:33:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZO4j-0004oO-OP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 15:33:53 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=48640 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZO4j-0004n7-I7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 15:33:49 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cZO4Z-0006T2-RZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:33:39 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> Correct me if I’m wrong but there are a lot of things in Org that are >> just about typesetting: *bold*, /italic/, _underlined_, =verbatim= and >> ~code~, +strike-through+. Would you remove these things as well? > > I could argue that emphasis is not just about typesetting. It conveys > a meaning. How emphasis is rendered _is_ typesetting, however. For > example, "latex" and "beamer" export back-ends render bold text > differently. It's similar to how HTML went from and to and . The former were presentation directives. The latter are semantic directives. They're practically the same, for reasons of backwards compatibility, and conceptual continuity. Org's emphasis markers are similar -- they *look* like presentation directives, but at this point they're actually used as semantic directives. Probably not helpful, Eric