From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: Can't execute C code block from remote directory [9.0.5
 (release_9.0.5-401-g86ff11 @ /Users/xcy/src/org-mode/lisp/)]
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:11:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87wpazz32k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m2wpb4duf1.fsf@xuchunyang.me> <m2o9wern8r.fsf@xuchunyang.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46438)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cvg2W-0002eZ-6T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 04:11:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cvg2S-0006Ex-V3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 04:11:40 -0400
Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:50509)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1cvg2S-0006Cu-PL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 04:11:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2o9wern8r.fsf@xuchunyang.me> (Chunyang Xu's message of "Mon, 03
	Apr 2017 14:58:28 +0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Chunyang Xu <mail@xuchunyang.me>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Chunyang Xu <mail@xuchunyang.me> writes:

> Here is a patch which can fix the issue.

Thank you.

> From e42b22f74c2f04a4d8e7eec0a6bdacbd08bebf12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chunyang Xu <mail@xuchunyang.me>
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:46:51 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] ob-C: Fix remote executing
>
> * lisp/ob-C.el (org-babel-C-execute): Process remote bin file.
>
> TINYCHANGE
> ---
>  lisp/ob-C.el | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/ob-C.el b/lisp/ob-C.el
> index 795bcb2b7..e54e17492 100644
> --- a/lisp/ob-C.el
> +++ b/lisp/ob-C.el
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ or `org-babel-execute:C++' or `org-babel-execute:D'."
>  	   (org-babel-eval
>  	    (pcase org-babel-c-variant
>  	      ((or `c `cpp)
> -	       (concat tmp-bin-file cmdline))
> +	       (concat (org-babel-process-file-name tmp-bin-file) cmdline))

I see that `tmp-bin-file' is used a couple other times in the body.
Would it make sense to wrap the initial binding within
`org-babel-process-file-name' instead of doing it only for this
occurrence?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou