From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Release Org 9.1 soon ?
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 11:39:36 +0200
Message-ID: <87wp5puz6v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87tw0uwxlz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAFyQvY0dJxC6JdS1qoPGEXoiAn_dmwc4SmeAi-4QToqs+3LaQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bmn1x0m0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAFyQvY28bLMGfak+L2+xybi_1SrJMmkRsrpAggz6dm_8PaTsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56394)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dlu2i-0000fi-2Z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 05:39:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dlu2h-0003VK-8J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2017 05:39:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAFyQvY28bLMGfak+L2+xybi_1SrJMmkRsrpAggz6dm_8PaTsKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Kaushal Modi's message of "Sun, 27 Aug 2017 01:53:07 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>, emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> writes:

> I need to create a new patch. Will do so in the coming week.

There's no hurry anyways. I don't consider this to be a blocker for Org
9.1. Of course, it is better if it can be integrated before.

>> I'd also like to add a new Org exporter, ox-hugo. As adding it wouldn't
>> > break other Org functionality, would it be safe to add it before this
>> > master cut? About this, would it be OK to start by creating a scratch
>> > branch?
>>
>> I think this can wait for Org 9.2. Inclusion in core may need to be
>> discussed and, in any case, code needs to be reviewed.

> Of course. Should I add that to a scratch branch for review?

Please do, but first, why do you think it is better to have it in core
instead of, e.g., GNU Elpa? Doesn't "ox-publish" provide some static
site generation features already?

Also, "ox-hugo" requires "ox-blackfriday", which is another Markdown
back-end. I'm not questioning the usefulness of this package, but
I think we need very good reasons to provide overlapping features out of
the box.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou