From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: Orgalist notes Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 16:44:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87wowk8ftb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <871ses9vg4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fENwt-0007Zh-4z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 19:47:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fENwo-0005Nd-66 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 19:47:43 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51848 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fENwn-0005MZ-UK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 19:47:38 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fENue-0001By-E0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2018 01:45:24 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I'm very pleased that orgalist has become its own package! However I'm > seeing a few of the same bugs that made the previous orgstruct-mode > frustrating, though I'm hoping they will be easier to fix now. > > There's one right there! Spurious indentation of everything after > the first line. > > Now I'm explicitly deleting indentation, and starting again at the left > margin. Another bug seems to appear when making lists: automatic > filling starts a new list item, rather than continuing the paragraph > of the first item. > > - Here's an item, now I'll hit M-RET > - Very nice > - Now here's an item that is so long that eventually the auto-fill kicks > - in and the line wraps. This line is now a new line item, rather than a > - continuation of the previous list item. So is this line. Though I just noted that, if I manually delete the hyphen from a second line, and then continue typing until it wraps to a third line, the third line (and the lines thereafter) is correctly interpreted as part of the first item (ie, no additional hyphens are inserted).