From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox.el: Fix extra character deleted in
 org-export--update-included-link
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:25:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87wo8qvl5x.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <86tv7lm79g.fsf@xkqr.org> <8736bhqftq.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874kvxxa5i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o8u252iv.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52454)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1j2Bgn-0001g4-QW
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:25:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1j2Bgm-00076a-A2
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:25:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87o8u252iv.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2020
 09:12:40 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> How would I dare to have an opinion m'lord? Only yours matters.
>
> Such sarcastic remarks hurt.

Indeed! But I eventually overcame the pain. Thank you for caring! :)

Last time we disagreed, you grossly concluded with:

   Future maintainers may of course interpret the recommendations of the
   FSF differently, but that's mine for now.

As far as my understanding permits, this means: "I'm am the one in
charge. I know what I'm doing. Discussion closed. Next."

I find this stance dubious, whatever the subject is, or if you are right
or wrong. To make my point go through, I'm now pushing it up to the
absurd. My intent is to warn, not to hurt.

> I may have done something (or worse, many things!) that frustrate you
> somehow, but using irony is not a good way to communicate on mailing
> lists.  

I know that is not a good way to communicate.

I also believe that lecturing others about communication on mailing
lists, or social behaviour in general, is not helpful either. Unless, of
course, you think being patronizing is more acceptable here than being
ironic. I hope you don't.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou