From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WNuLIgJ/Xl8jUQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:20:18 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 0C/yHAJ/Xl8nIAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:20:18 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3615C9400C7 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46232 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHYTx-0000e0-5L for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:20:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHYTH-0000CG-Qk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:19:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHYTH-0005D2-Gn; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:19:35 -0400 Received: from lns-bzn-32-82-254-31-120.adsl.proxad.net ([82.254.31.120]:35330 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kHYTH-0005FO-3N; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:19:35 -0400 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B61E1A60D6C; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:19:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: Any reason not to generate my own custom ID value (NOT CUSTOM_ID)? Organization: GNU References: <8e204de9ad9da09812991449c64d7aad@isnotmyreal.name> <7689df3cbba5ea4afec672d80f99c590@isnotmyreal.name> <87pn6ti0kt.fsf@localhost> <11d07d7c64137cc1fb512e9cc546ab08@isnotmyreal.name> <87h7s4iwe0.fsf@localhost> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:19:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h7s4iwe0.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:51:35 +0800") Message-ID: <87wo0xig4q.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TRS-80 , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: OlfMwAAdSats Hi Ihor, Ihor Radchenko writes: >> However, I just (strongly) prefer the shorter "ISO-like" ID for many >> reasons, as already mentioned (shorter, meaningful, etc.). I just find >> that style much, much more elegant. > > I guess it does not take much to add this functionality. It looks okay to me, for after 9.4. Thanks for putting this patch together! -- Bastien