From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Griswold Subject: Re: PocketMod for org-mode Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:56:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87ve96nh5t.fsf@cantor.griswold.home> References: <87zlyiprzz.fsf@novell.com> <874pgqpken.fsf@cantor.griswold.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ii6ZT-0002xV-Sr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:56:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ii6ZR-0002xI-1D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:56:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ii6ZQ-0002xE-S8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:56:12 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ii6ZQ-0003h2-Cb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:56:12 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ii6ZH-000550-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:56:03 +0000 Received: from cpe-66-67-61-244.rochester.res.rr.com ([66.67.61.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:56:03 +0000 Received: from dgriswol by cpe-66-67-61-244.rochester.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:56:03 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Leo writes: > On 2007-10-17 03:03 +0100, Dan Griswold wrote: >> Also, a little gotcha I've found, which may catch some of us org-mode >> GTD-ers: cal-tex.el does not check for the @ symbol when inputting >> from the diary, and thus does not escape it, leading to latex-errors >> on processing. > > This probably should be reported to emacs-devel. Thanks, Leo. I'll try that. Dan -- -------------- Dan Griswold Rochester, NY --------------