From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: FR: multiple scheduling of one item? Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:34:23 +0000 Message-ID: <87ve65divk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20071231152158.GN20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <43E2D02D-CF49-4074-98C0-58D93E7B05F3@gmail.com> <20080103223921.GB4991@fastwebnet.it> <20080104095502.GH18716@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87lk72fit8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20080107101441.GJ18716@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBpJM-0005Dt-Hd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:34:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBpJL-0005B3-DN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:34:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBpJL-0005Al-6S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:34:27 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBpJL-00036S-2Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:34:27 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so9173709fkx.10 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:34:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080107101441.GJ18716@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's message of "Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:14:41 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Adam Spiers Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Spiers writes: >> Org would first check the "SCHEDULED:" cookie, then check for further >> re-schedulding (the property might also be called "RESCHEDULDED".) > > Whilst tracking re-scheduling might be useful, it wasn't my intention. > I wanted to be able to create a schedule in advance which spans > multiple sessions. Now that I've read Sacha's article thoroughly, I better understand why you would need such a feature. I still think it's better not to clutter an entry with too many SCHEDULED: cookies floating around... I'd prefer to be able to hide them in a drawer. -- Bastien => /away