From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: henry atting Subject: Question about cursor movement Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:44:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87vdwwm9qm.fsf@literaturlatenight.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KfcGk-0003JC-8k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:15:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KfcGj-0003Hk-AM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:15:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42716 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KfcGj-0003HZ-1w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:15:09 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:50672 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KfcGi-0004qT-Mv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:15:08 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KfcGd-0004Ky-0t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:15:03 +0000 Received: from port-92-195-74-17.dynamic.qsc.de ([92.195.74.17]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:15:03 +0000 Received: from nspm_01 by port-92-195-74-17.dynamic.qsc.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:15:03 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, | 1 | 2 | sum | | |--------+------+--------+-----------| | 121.00 | 4.00 | 125.00 | store1 | | 125.00 | 5.00 | 130.00 | store2 | | 130.00 | | | | #+TBLFM: $1=@-1$3::$3=$1+$2 I have a simple table for some sort of expenses. I don't understand why the cursor behaves the way it does: I do a `=' in $1 or $3 and after the result is placed in the field, the cursor jumps down one row. As *my* intended move would be to the next columnn in the same row I find this rather inconvenient. Would'nt it be better if the cursor simply stays where it is and lets me to decide the matter? Cheers henry