From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard KLINDA Subject: Re: New :base-extension parameter: :none Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:30:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87vdrf8swk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87eiy3ae2n.fsf@gmail.com> <87iqnflgq6.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXfQg-0007pE-Mh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:32:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXfQf-0007ot-Ay for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:32:50 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44066 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXfQf-0007oq-3t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:32:49 -0500 Received: from viefep15-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.35]:15252) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXfQe-0002U4-Gr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:32:48 -0500 Received: from edge05.upc.biz ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090212173247.GBVZ3373.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge05.upc.biz> for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:32:47 +0100 Received: from ignotus by localhost with local (masqmail 0.2.21) id 1LXfOF-6xh-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:30:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87iqnflgq6.fsf@CPU107.opentrends.net> (Daniel Clemente's message of "Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:14:57 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] New :base-extension parameter: :none'; Daniel Clemente adds: > Richard KLINDA writes: >> ,---- | '("test" . (:base-directory "~/test/" :base-extension :none >> | ;; <---- new :none keyword > Shouldn't that be :base-extension 'none with a symbol instead of a > keyword? 'none is fine with me too, Carsten please change the symbol to 'none if you think that is more in line with org conventions. > I think : is for KEYwords, symbols that are going to be used as keys > in a hash table. Actually no, you can use keywords in situations like this, keywords are just symbols that evaluate to themselves, it's simply a stylistic choice. -- Udv, Richard