From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [RFC] inline task formatting in odt/doc (was Re: Org-odt fails to export when inline tasks are present) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87vctxjnb7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <81vcua60rm.fsf@gmail.com> <81sjpbhm8o.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtN82-000765-0r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:08:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtN80-0000tS-M0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:08:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtN80-0000tL-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:08:36 -0400 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so89644wyi.0 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:08:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81sjpbhm8o.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:30:23 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: org-mode mailing list Hi Jambunathan, Jambunathan K writes: > Are there any opinions/preferences on how inline tasks could be exported > in to odt format. I think having an ability to quickly navigate through > all the inline tasks in the exported document would be a > pre-requisite. I don't use inline tasks myself, so I don't have a strong opinion about this. > I am thinking of exporting them as "Insert->Comments" and from > OpenOffice help it seems one can quickly visit such comments in > order. These sounds like a reasonable choice, assuming we can find a solution for the problem Suvayu has been pointing at. If the solution we try to implement first is not the best one, we can always improve it afterwards. Thanks in advance for implementing this! -- Bastien