From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:30:46 -0600
Message-ID: <87vcrdyfhy.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <87aa8u5mu7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871uu65j7i.fsf@gmail.com> <201110231442.17386.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
	<80obx6vniu.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47479)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RIWhd-0000NY-Jj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:25:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RIWhb-0002lB-Qe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:25:21 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]:50560)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RIWhb-0002kO-JN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:25:19 -0400
Received: by mail-pz0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 13so73714pzd.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Bausch wrote:
>>>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
>>> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>>>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
>>
>> what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
>>
>> That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the additional 
>> line is for, is to "name" it.
>
> As Eric showed us, this is not always to name it... If the table is the
> results of an unamed block, you will have #+name: followed by no name!
>
> #+name:
> | line 1 | data1 |
> | line 2 | data2 |
>
> what I also find quite disturbing.
>

I also find this to be disconcerting. -- Eric

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/