From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Elisp programming style Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:43:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87vcr8p7ig.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <86obx2gvmd.fsf@googlemail.com> <8762j94dz0.fsf@gmail.com> <86obx1qkcc.fsf@googlemail.com> <8739edf1vx.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca> <86d3dhouu5.fsf@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK3aL-0006ck-AE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 03:44:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK3aK-0001Wo-5r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 03:44:09 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK3aJ-0001Wd-QT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 03:44:08 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RK3aH-0008TC-Sw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:44:05 +0200 Received: from 91-67-169-145-dynip.superkabel.de ([91.67.169.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:44:05 +0200 Received: from tassilo by 91-67-169-145-dynip.superkabel.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 09:44:05 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten writes: > I start do discover that the cl package does have some nice functions > (like flet). For code that's included in emacs (or wants to be), you should not require the cl package at runtime. But it's ok to require it at compile time for using its macros [dolist, flet, ...]. Bye, Tassilo -- (What the world needs (I think) is not (a Lisp (with fewer parentheses)) but (an English (with more.))) Brian Hayes, http://tinyurl.com/3y9l2kf