From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:37:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcn911oe.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <87pqeqb76j.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <878vlem00k.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87zkdtuwc3.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87vcohgrdc.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <30ae09b29d262e6156ec9818df085441@mail.rickster.com> <87k44hcecr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxR16-0000vT-HY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxR13-0002gG-Sm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:32 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxR13-0002fu-MN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:29 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxR0w-0005Wz-S8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:38:22 +0100 Received: from vpn-2205.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:38:22 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2205.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:38:22 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Leo Alekseyev writes: > I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've > been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in > org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as expected) but > instead prompts for file name to save. This is rather bad behavior. > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Bastien wrote: >> Hi Leo, >> >> Leo Alekseyev writes: >> >>> Folks, I still think that the fact that buffer-file-name is not nil is >>> a bug and should be fixed. >> >> So do I.  I think this is fixed now -- thanks! >> >> -- >>  Bastien Hi all, I am also seeing this behaviour and classify it as regression. Regards, Andreas