emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
To: Brian Wightman <MidLifeXis@wightmanfam.org>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "Time-stamp: <>" in (first 8 lines of) export template
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:10:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vclv1k8c.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALbR6203WywBoj6_9qG7B5v7yEbjG3YVj49B730yigincjPhYg@mail.gmail.com> (Brian Wightman's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:58:39 -0500")

Hi Brian,

Brian Wightman <MidLifeXis@wightmanfam.org> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Sebastien Vauban
> <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> wrote:
>> Then, I can provide a patch with `time-stamp' function added to
>> `before-save-hook' in Org mode.
>
> I would lobby against this being the default template, as these time
> stamps really mess up the ability to merge org files from multiple
> branches without conflicts.
>
> A ------- B ------- D
> \                     /
>  \--------C--------/
>
> At the merge, D would have a conflict to resolve by hand.
>
> I used timestamps and the save hook mentioned above for a while and
> ended up needing to do unnecessary (and in the context of a rev
> control like GIT - non-useful) manual conflict resolution, so have
> since removed them from every file I had previously added them to.

I agree adding Time-stamp as a keyword could lead to such problems.  
So unless there are new arguments for such an inclusion, I'm closing
this right now.  

Sébastien, if you have your own hack for this, please share it on Worg!

Best,

-- 
 Bastien

      reply	other threads:[~2012-03-23 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-16 15:01 [PATCH] Add "Time-stamp: <>" in (first 8 lines of) export template Sebastien Vauban
2012-03-20 11:49 ` Bastien
2012-03-20 12:45   ` Sebastien Vauban
2012-03-20 15:58     ` Brian Wightman
2012-03-23 14:10       ` Bastien [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vclv1k8c.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=MidLifeXis@wightmanfam.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).