From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: unexpected (buggy?) export to iCalendar beheaviour Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:26:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87vcbstf45.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20121203100916.22bbd719@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmwo8-0001nV-4k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:26:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmwo7-0005EQ-4H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:26:20 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:45800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tmwo6-0005EM-V0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:26:19 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ei8so2958283wgb.8 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:26:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121203100916.22bbd719@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> (Detlef Steuer's message of "Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:09:16 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Detlef Steuer Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Detlef Steuer writes: > This > > --- > * important > SCHEDULED: <2012-12-03 Mo> > * not so important > <2012-12-03 Mo> > --- > > is exported via C-c E i to > > --- > BEGIN:VCALENDAR > VERSION:2.0 > X-WR-CALNAME:test > PRODID:-//steuer//Emacs with Org-mode//EN > X-WR-TIMEZONE:CET > X-WR-CALDESC:nil > CALSCALE:GREGORIAN > BEGIN:VEVENT > UID: TS-f58e8c25-322d-426b-b4e9-6b3f74fff4ea > DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20121203 > DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20121204 > SUMMARY:not so important > DESCRIPTION: <2012-12-03 Mo> > CATEGORIES:test > END:VEVENT > END:VCALENDAR > --- > > So the SCHEDULED event is not exported. I assume that's a bug? I cannot reproduce this either from the maint or master branch. Let us know if there is still a bug for this. Thanks! -- Bastien