From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:21:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87vc4sop20.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAJpRBmdxSA6uov+2whJ_H2PSzmjVTYMgzWHcu3NncDK1v4XWsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k3l8q4vx.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvvwnank.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34927)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Uu4Gj-0000Yb-AH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:21:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Uu4Gi-0000sM-3T
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:21:33 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]:53659)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Uu4Gh-0000sF-Tv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:21:32 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j13so5019641wgh.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87fvvwnank.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Tue, 02
	Jul 2013 22:48:07 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: feng shu <tumashu@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> feng shu <tumashu@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.
>>>
>>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =`make'= be a
>>>   preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring.
>>
>> I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide
>> a function that will call "make" instead?
>>
>> It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this
>> one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments.
>
> Can (other ...) be used here?  See (info "(elisp) Composite Types")

AFAIU, `other' means "whatever your answer is, always do the same",
which is not what we want.

If you want "give whatever you want and we'll use it", it should be
a `string' type. But can't `function', which is already implemented, do
the same anyway?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou