Re: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

[Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> feng shu <tumashu@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Feng Shu <tumashu@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.
>>>
>>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =`make'= be a
>>>   preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring.
>>
>> I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide
>> a function that will call "make" instead?
>>
>> It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this
>> one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments.
>
> Can (other ...) be used here?  See (info "(elisp) Composite Types")

AFAIU, `other' means "whatever your answer is, always do the same",
which is not what we want.

If you want "give whatever you want and we'll use it", it should be
a `string' type. But can't `function', which is already implemented, do
the same anyway?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou