From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Babel] Inaccuracy in Sec. 14.8.2.13 `:noweb' of the manual
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 08:51:38 -0600
Message-ID: <87vc4qidj9.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87sizuu369.fsf@gmail.com> <86zju2vg9a.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38009)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UukuN-00070m-4b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:53:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UukuL-0005nN-TP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:53:19 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]:45998)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UukuL-0005nA-N1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:53:17 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w11so1173523pde.37
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 07:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <86zju2vg9a.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of
	"Thu, 04 Jul 2013 11:14:25 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:

> Hello Christophe,
>
> Christophe Pouzat wrote:
>> There seems to be a wrong statement in the description of the value
>> strip-export' of header :noweb (Sec. 14.8.2.13) of the manual:
>>
>>   `strip-export' "Noweb" syntax references in the body of the code
>>   block will be expanded before the block is evaluated or tangled.
>>   However, "noweb" syntax references will not be removed when the
>>   code block is exported.
>>
>> The last phrase states that the noweb reference *will not be removed* but
>> after trying it out with the last ELPA version of org (July 3rd), it turns
>> out that *it is removed* (which makes sense given the name).
>
> Yes, you're right; it should be:
>
>     However, "noweb" syntax references will be stripped when the code block is
>     exported.
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

Just pushed up a fix.  Thanks,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte