From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Deactivate babel source block
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:57:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87vc163gya.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <l2rb84$gdv$1@ger.gmane.org> <87k3hqfnbj.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m2vc19eb2n.fsf@krugs.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52184)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1VTqWH-0003Um-Qv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 05:57:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1VTqWB-0006ZI-Jn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 05:57:29 -0400
Received: from mail14-co9on0066.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com
	([157.56.211.66]:3978 helo=CO9EHSNDR003.bigfish.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1VTqWB-0006YM-BM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 05:57:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2vc19eb2n.fsf@krugs.de> (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Mon, 7
	Oct 2013 10:31:44 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:

[...]

> Correct me if I am wrong, but I seem to remember that source blocks
> under a commented heading are not tangled?
>
> But I just tried it now, and it doesn't seem to be the case anymore -
> code blocks under commented header are still tangled - has this feature
> been removed or was it never there?

It was there; we had a discussion about this early this year.  There is
a commit log entry indicating that this was implemented:

,----
| commit 8e0b4529f780de4e442d26a7ba4aedd892c78c5b
| Author: Bastien Guerry <bzg@altern.org>
| Date:   Thu Feb 28 10:25:21 2013 +0100
| 
|     ob-tangle.el (org-babel-tangle-collect-blocks): Don't collect blocks in commented out headings
|     
|     * ob-tangle.el (org-babel-tangle-collect-blocks): Don't
|     collect blocks in commented out headings.
|     
|     Thansk to the various people who requested this.
`----

but I also found recently that code blocks in commented sections are
indeed tangled.

I have no idea what has happened to the code since.
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.2.1-66-gf871fb