From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josiah Schwab Subject: Re: Assistance with patching instructions on Worg Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:57:08 -0800 Message-ID: <87vbwzep4r.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y51veqo3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9N1W-0003kf-83 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:57:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9N1N-0005IX-Qi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:57:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]:42518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9N1N-0005IR-He for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:57:13 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id un15so4952082pbc.18 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy Cc: emacs-orgmode jw.hendy@gmail.com writes: > I was just following along with Worg, which doesn't mention doing > that. I'm now thinking that `git add` must be implied in the line > =make some changes (1)=? Yes, I agree; as written, there is an implicit `git add`. I think it would be reasonable to make that explicit. Best, Josiah