From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: update to ob-clojure.el
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:51:37 +0200
Message-ID: <87vbu7x006.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <CAA01p3r0CKjLEbsxDU8T291=ic+hqMau12fz0WPe+bCCMroYOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1397402434.2038.7.camel@raven-CM5571>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49913)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WarPW-0001W7-GY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:51:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WarPR-00065h-4Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:51:46 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]:60973)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WarPQ-000640-UE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:51:41 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b13so797283wgh.17
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1397402434.2038.7.camel@raven-CM5571> (Soapy Smith's message of
	"Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:20:34 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Soapy Smith <soapy-smith@comcast.net>
Cc: org mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Oleh <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>

Hi Greg and Oleh,

Soapy Smith <soapy-smith@comcast.net> writes:

> I'm not sure about removing nrepl and slime, as there may be some still
> using them, especially nrepl.  As long as it is not getting in the way,
> perhaps at this time it would be better to leave them in?

Agreed.

> I'm not sure
> the open-source and/or emacs-org philosophy on this kind of thing.

"If it ain't broken, don't fix it."

> Prior to updating the documentation for Clojure code blocks earlier this
> year, which was several years old, I did a lot of searching around and
> came to the conclusion that the slime and swank-clojure functionality
> was no longer being developed, and the community had moved on to nrepl.
> CIDER evolved from nrepl, and is the current direction.
>
> https://github.com/clojure-emacs/cider
>
> The revised documentation is very "CIDER-centric":
>
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-clojure.html

Yes, we shall put all efforts into supporting CIDER, and then ping the
Clojure community to know whether slime and nrepl still need to be
supported.  But for Org 8.3, let's continue to have those.

-- 
 Bastien